Nov 07, 2012 12:59 PM EST
California’s Proposition 33 For Car Insurance Changes Denied, Mercury General Chairman George Joseph Out $16 Million

Proposition 33, a California bailout measure that would have changed the state's regulations for auto insurance was denied on Tuesday night. The proposition was funded by Mercury General Co. Chairman George Joseph who put around $16 million of his own money to make sure the proposition was passed.

If passed, according to the official California voter guide, it would have changed the current law to "allow insurance companies to set prices based on whether the driver previously carried auto insurance with any insurance company. It also would have allowed proportional discount for drivers with some prior coverage and increased the overall cost for drivers without history of continuous coverage." 

The legislation would have changed the initiative that regulated auto insurance in CA and banned insurers from offering different kinds of discounts and providing a special rate for previously insured drivers according to the The Los Angeles Times.

The Department of Insurance stated on Monday that auto insurers would have had to offer a new discount that would have charged higher rates to customers who didn't previous qualify for insurance as well.  The proposition would have charged responsible drivers $1,000 who stop driving for legitimate reasons The Los Angeles Times

A "YES" vote would have meant insurance companies could offer brand new discounts on auto insurance premiums based on the number of years in the previous five years that the car was insured.

Voting '"NO" on the measure meant that insurers could continue to provide discounts to long-term car insurance customers. It also means that companies would continue providing discounts to new customers who switch from other agencies.

People who were for the legislation argued that Californians currently with insurance would get a discount after the law was passed. It would have also allowed people the freedom to change companies and keep your discount. It would have lowered insurance rates and insured more drivers overall.

A similar proposition was determined in 1988 when Proposition 103 was passed and allowed auto insurance to cut premiums and tie rates together to the risks caused by specific drivers. 

Related Articles:

Linda McMahon Loses Second Connecticut Senate Election To Chris Murphy, Has Spent $100 Million Of Personal Money Last Two Elections, How Her Campaign Affected WWE (VIDEO)

Maine, Maryland Approve Same Sex Marriage, Colorado, Washington Legalize Marijuana, How It Affects Your State

Election Results: Voters Having Glitch Issues When Trying To Vote In Certain States (VIDEO)

Microsoft, Ford To Celebrate Five Years Of In-Car Connectivity, 5 Million SYNC-Equipped Cars Sold (VIDEO)

See Now: OnePlus 6: How Different Will It Be From OnePlus 5?

 PREVIOUS POST
NEXT POST 

EDITOR'S PICK    

Hyundai to Invest $16.1 Billion for EV Business; Sets Annual Sales Goal of 1.87M Electric Cars by 2030

World's Most Expensive and Most Heavily-optioned Porsche 928 GTS is Coming Home to the U.S.

Major Boost as Tesla Giga Berlin Facility in Final Phase of Approval Process; Delivery Event Set This Month

Audi Looking for e-tron Electric Vehicles to Spur Car Brand's Growth in India in 2022

Toyota Offers Free EV Charging to Owners of 2023 bZ4X After Partnership Agreement with EVgo

2022 Suzuki Baleno Finally Unveiled in India: What are the Specs and Features of this City Car?