Jun 28, 2012 09:42 AM EDT
Porsche Accused of Misleading Investors on Volkswagen Takeover

World class Italian luxury car maker seems to be in troubled waters. 

Investors claiming Porsche SE misled them about plans to take over Volkswagen in 2008, will head to German courtrooms on Wednesday for the first time, pushing demands for more than 4 billion euros ($5 billion) in damages.

A regional court in northern town Brunswick will open hearings on four lawsuits on Wednesday morning. A fifth case, brought by Elliott Associates and other U.S. investment funds and accounting for 2 billion euros of damages alone, has yet to be scheduled.

German and U.S. investors say that throughout 2008 Porsche camouflaged its plans to acquire VW and instead secretly piled up its holding. In March 2008, the sportscar maker dismissed as "speculation" intentions to take over the much-bigger VW, which builds more cars in a week than Porsche does in a year.

Seven months later, Porsche said it controlled 42.6 percent of VW's common shares and cash-settled options for another 31.5 percent of the stock it had not disclosed previously. The German state of Lower Saxony, where VW is based, holds 20 percent of Europe's biggest auto manufacturer.

The risks related to pending lawsuits caused VW to drop initial plans for a merger with Porsche's holding company. VW is now aiming to buy the remainder of Porsche's auto-making operations at minimum taxation costs.

Porsche SE, the publicly traded holding company that owns stakes of just over 50 percent in the German sportscar maker and in VW, has repeatedly denied the allegations.

"The plaintiffs before the Brunswick court are professional investors who deliberately took a huge gamble and backed the wrong horse," a spokesman for the Stuttgart-based company said.

German group ARFB will raise the highest claims at the hearing on Wednesday, representing investment funds seeking damages of 351 million euros from Porsche and 1.8 billion euros from both, Porsche and VW. A VW spokesman has said the case was "unfounded."

The court will decide on Wednesday whether ARFB must give proof that it is able to shoulder the process costs in the event of defeat. It was unclear when the court will hear the actual case.

See Now: OnePlus 6: How Different Will It Be From OnePlus 5?

 PREVIOUS POST
NEXT POST 

EDITOR'S PICK    

Hyundai to Invest $16.1 Billion for EV Business; Sets Annual Sales Goal of 1.87M Electric Cars by 2030

World's Most Expensive and Most Heavily-optioned Porsche 928 GTS is Coming Home to the U.S.

Major Boost as Tesla Giga Berlin Facility in Final Phase of Approval Process; Delivery Event Set This Month

Audi Looking for e-tron Electric Vehicles to Spur Car Brand's Growth in India in 2022

Toyota Offers Free EV Charging to Owners of 2023 bZ4X After Partnership Agreement with EVgo

2022 Suzuki Baleno Finally Unveiled in India: What are the Specs and Features of this City Car?